Curvature Diagnostics in Lorentzian Geometry with Applications to General Relativity

Authors

  • Brima Conteh Department of Mathematics, Milton Margai Technical University, Sierra Leone Author
  • Momoh Kamara Department of Curriculum and Teaching, Ernest Bai Koroma University of science technology - Port Loko campus, Sierra Leone Author
  • Christian Abu Sandy Department of Mathematics, Milton Margai Technical University, Sierra Leone Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jnsrr/V2E10/2026-02

Keywords:

Lorentzian geometry, curvature invariants, geodesic deviation, Schwarzschild space-time, plane waves, general relativity

Abstract

Scalar curvature invariants are coordinate independent, but their ability to detect curvature and identify geometric structure depends on the class of Lorentzian metrics under consideration. This focused survey compares scalar and observer-dependent tidal diagnostics in four-dimensional general relativity. After fixing the curvature convention, we give explicit proofs for three model classes. For Schwarzschild space-time, the Kretschmann scalar and the squared norm of its gradient recover the areal radius and positive mass parameter within the specified solution family. The gradient invariant vanishes at the horizon, while a regular coordinate extension establishes that the horizon is not a curvature singularity. For homogeneous and isotropic metrics, the Kretschmann scalar separates temporal and spatial curvature contributions and provides a class-specific flatness criterion. An exact vacuum plane wave supplies a counterexample to any unrestricted inference from vanishing scalar polynomial curvature invariants to flatness: its algebraic curvature contractions vanish while its tidal operator remains nonzero. The examples are related to established work on invariant characterization, stationary-horizon diagnostics and low-regularity singularity theorems. They show why a diagnostic must be accompanied by metric-class assumptions, an observer specification where appropriate, and a distinction between local curvature and global causal structure. The contribution is a comparative mathematical exposition with explicit derivations; no new classification theorem or observational result is claimed.

References

1) Carroll, S.M.: Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Addison-Wesley (2004).

2) Coley, A., Hervik, S., Pelavas, N.: Spacetimes characterized by their scalar curvature invariants. Class. Quantum Grav. 26, 025013 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/2/025013

3) Flanagan, É.É., Hughes, S.A.: The basics of gravitational wave theory. New J. Phys. 7, 204 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/204

4) Kunzinger, M., Ohanyan, A., Schinnerl, B., Steinbauer, R.: The Hawking–Penrose singularity theorem for C^1-Lorentzian metrics. Commun. Math. Phys. 391, 1143–1179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-022-04335-8

5) Page, D.N., Shoom, A.A.: Local invariants vanishing on stationary horizons: A diagnostic for locating black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 141102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.141102

6) Penrose, R.: Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57–59 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57

7) Steinbauer, R.: The singularity theorems of general relativity and their low regularity extensions. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math. Ver. 125, 73–119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1365/s13291-022-00263-7

8) Tong, D.: General Relativity. University of Cambridge lecture notes (2019). https://www.davidtong.org/pdfs/teaching/general-relativity/gr.pdf. Accessed 5 October 2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

Conteh , B., Kamara , M., & Sandy , C. A. (2026). Curvature Diagnostics in Lorentzian Geometry with Applications to General Relativity. Journal of Natural Science Research and Review, 2(10), 319-323. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jnsrr/V2E10/2026-02